cl-patterns-study/2022-09-07-trying-more-arpe...

90 lines
4.3 KiB
Common Lisp

;; let's try the pfunc to create arpegio from the chord
(in-package :cl-patterns)
(next-upto-n (pbind :chord (pseq (list :major :minor :minor-triad :major))
:note (pfunc (lambda ()
(let* ((chord (event-value *event* :chord))
(notes (nchord chord)))
;; let's keep it simple for a moment
notes))
)) 10)
;; ((EVENT :CHORD :MAJOR :NOTE (0 4 7)) (EVENT :CHORD :MINOR :NOTE (0 3 7))
;; (EVENT :CHORD :MINOR-TRIAD :NOTE (0 3 7)) (EVENT :CHORD :MAJOR :NOTE (0 4 7))
;; (EVENT :CHORD :MAJOR :NOTE (0 4 7)) (EVENT :CHORD :MINOR :NOTE (0 3 7))
;; (EVENT :CHORD :MINOR-TRIAD :NOTE (0 3 7)) (EVENT :CHORD :MAJOR :NOTE (0 4 7))
;; (EVENT :CHORD :MAJOR :NOTE (0 4 7)) (EVENT :CHORD :MINOR :NOTE (0 3 7)))
;; And I'd still in parp generator
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (pfunc (lambda ()
(let* ((chord (event-value *event* :chord))
(notes (nchord chord)))
;; let's keep it simple for a moment
(pseq notes 1)))
))) 10)
;; for some reason this stays on first chord forever, but does arpegio
;; bit of something I don't understand
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :ocatave (pseq (list 3 4 3 5)))
(pbind :note (pseq (list 0 1 2) 1))) 12) ; needed 1 repeat limit here
;; let's try with #'PK
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (let* ((chord (pk :chord))
(notes (nchord chord)))
;; let's keep it simple for a moment
(pseq notes 1)))) 10)
;; error, no applicable method
;; how does that work then?
(pdef :foo
(parp (pbind :note (pnary #'chord-notes (pseq (list :major :minor :maj7 :maj6 :major) 1))
:dur (pseq (list 1 1 2 1 1 2)))
(pbind :note (p+ (pk :note)
(pseq (list 0 2 3 1 3 0) 1)))))
(next-upto-n (pdef :foo) 10)
;; and what if I change :note to :chord here?
(next-upto-n (pdef :foo
(parp (pbind :chord (pnary #'chord-notes (pseq (list :major :minor :maj7 :maj6 :major) 1))
:dur (pseq (list 1 1 2 1 1 2)))
(pbind :note (p+ (pk :chord)
(pseq (list 0 2 3 1 3 0) 1))))) 10)
;; maybe difference is that #'LET* can't be directly in the place that defined :note?
;; and I should use #'PSEQ and move #'LET* into list definiton?
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (pseq (let* ((chord (pk :chord))
(notes (nchord chord)))
notes)
1)))
10)
;; or maybe (pk :chord) is a pattern and can't be used as "just function to get value"
;; seems true
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (pk :chord)))
10)
;; here pk :chord is object so, endless pattern and we never switch to :major
;; but that's ok,
;; main lesson I guess that I need to use pattern transformation functions,
;; and lisp transformations mainly on arguments
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (pfunc (lambda ()
(pseq (nchord (event-value *event* :chord)) 1)))))
10)
;; endless stream, inner :note doesn't end?
(next-upto-n (parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major)))
(pbind :note (pseq (pnary #'nchord (pk :chord)) 2)))
20)
;; not that seems to work?
(pdef :maybe-arpegio
(parp (pbind :chord (pseq (list :minor-triad :major) 2))
(pbind :note (pseq (pnary #'nchord (pk :chord)) 2))))
;; (play :maybe-arpegio)
;; (end :maybe-arpegio)
;; (stop :maybe-arpegio)
;; could I maybe now insert this into a pb
;; so that I could change speed and root for whole thing?